WP:MOS subguideline, anyone? Imo, this guideline could be far more usefully handled and improved if it where a dedicated WP:MOS subguideline. The applicable policy (WP:

This is a guideline discussing the reliability of particular types of sources. The relevant policies on sources are Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:

Template:Subcat guideline. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources. This page is a guideline, not a policy, and is mandatory only insofar as it repeats ...

Wikipedia:Reliable sources; Wikipedia:Notability (people) Wikipedia:Autobiography; Wikipedia:Conflict of interest Notes ? Jimmy Wales. Keynote speech, Wikimania, August 2006. ? 2.0 2.1 ...

Editors can post questions here about whether given sources are reliable, and editors interested in sourcing issues will answer. Please post new topics in a new section.

... content contributed by a user with low edit count. A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia are as reliable a ...

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who ...

WS-ReliableMessaging describes a protocol that allows SOAP messages to be delivered reliably between distributed applications in the presence of software component, system, or ...

Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia is usually reliable, but that it is not always clear how much. The project's preference for consensus over credentials has been labelled "anti ...

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a publisher of original thought. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not ...

... critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for much of the information makes it unreliable. Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia is usually reliable ...

... subject is a good test for notability. "Sources," defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable ...

The goal of Wikipedia is to become a complete and reliable encyclopedia. Verifiability is the key to becoming a reliable resource, so editors should cite credible sources so that ...

There are now enough serious incidents of false and defamatory information in Wikipedia biographies to warrant prohibiting this as a reference source in universities and university ...

The creators of Wikipedia are the first to admit that not every entry is accurate and that it might not be the best source of material for research papers.

This means that any material that is challenged and has no source may be removed by any editor. See those pages and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information.

Is Wikipedia accurate and reliable? Wikipedia is a compendium of existing, published knowledge and is only as reliable as the external sources on which it relies.

... sources may draw on primary sources and other secondary sources to create a general overview; or to make analytic or synthetic claims. Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable ...

In the case of edits lacking citations, according to Wikipedia:Verifiability: Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors may object if you remove material ...

Postmaster General Group: Bots Posts: 3,233 Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm Member No.: 2,885 ?

1] /wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources [2] For just one example, as of January 2007, neither the Washington Post nor the New York Times had mentioned the "North American SuperCorridor ...

... statement and raises the question why the same high-level Administrator and author of several of Wikipedia's core content and citation policies, including Wikipedia:Reliable ...

WWW. The World is Always Watching .Com | Main | Filipino Youth "Mobilize" Revolution » August 23, 2006 Wikipedia: Reliable Resource for Politics?

As you probably all know, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, but what makes it different from all the other encyclopediae is that anyone, and I mean ANYONE, can edit what is ...

Inside ITS is an online newsletter that publishes approximately twice per semester. «

Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? (pdf file) From the 5 th international Symposium on Online Journalism comes this rather interesting analysis of the ...

... with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information. That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia ...

For awhile now, users of Wikipedia have been able to find out who edits certain entries by looking up the ip address of the person who did the edit.

Keep in mind that in determining proper weight we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors.

Wikipedia is a good first place to go to do your research, but should never be the last place to finish with! We?ve got more than 2 million articles now so our only aim at this ...